Translate

Powered By Blogger

3.2.17

Hegel as opposed to Leftism/ Hegel can be abused, but so can Kant as he was adopted by Post Modernism. There is no system that cannot be abused.

I think the left made its progress by taking the name of Hegel in vain and misappropriating some of his slogans and by misunderstanding him (maybe on purpose) to fit. That is, -- if all they had was Rousseau, that would not have been enough. So, one step in the right direction I believe is to retake the battle field. They have got Hegel? Then take him back. Show how he was opposite to everything the Left is about. And after all is said and done, even the real intellectuals of the Left were aware they had to repudiate Hegel. [Marx turned Hegel's system upside down.] Just for an example, with Hegel morals are real and objective, and can be perceived by reason, though not directly. (This is opposed to Marx who held that morals depend only on class, not objective reality, ) Hegel is a plain rebuke to Hume who limits reason to perceiving contradictions. [Hegel agrees with Kant about the bridge from sense data to concepts. That bridge was by a-perception. The aspect of this that was significant to Hegel was the triad form. Body-apperception-mind. And by organic processes, Hegel saw a hint of how to get beyond contradictions. Contradictions was the whole point of Kant about one cannot get to the thing in itself.]