I do have a point of view in which I try to fit the good points of many different philosophers. That is basically of Plotinus (i.e Neo-Plato). So while I accept the insights of the Kant-Fries-Nelson school of thought, I think about Reason as not being human reason at all, but Divine Reason which can be manifested in living beings to some degree.
[So I do not think human reason determines the nature of things. Rather Divine wisdom permeates Creation and determines the laws of nature.]
But it takes a certain degree of common sense to be able to tell who really has something to say and who does not.
The problem with modern philosophy is the tactic of writing in a manner that is incomprehensible, then accusing critics of failure to comprehend, as though the fault resides with the critics rather than the original writer.
So I do try to use common sense to have a consistent world view. But I do have a kind of starting place which is Plato and Plotinus. And with that context I manage to fit in the insights of the Kant-Fries-Nelson school of thought, (non intuitive immediate knowledge --faith) [but also find an important place for G.E. Moore with the fact that reason recognizes universals, Certainly each of these schools would disagree with each other. But by means of the Plato Plotinus system I manage to fit it all in one consistent system. But I am not arguing for this. I am simply saying my own world view for those that might care what I am thinking.
Now you might wonder from where I picked up this world view. Well in part because after school I waited for my dad to pick me up at the library and while waiting I used to read Plato. And then later I learned the Chovot Levavot [Obligations of the Hearts by Ibn Pakuda] while at the Mir in NY and his system is neo-Platonic [i.e. Plato-Plotinus.]
