Most of those subjects are in " "Nashim" that is
the tractates of Ketuboth and Yevamot. And those tractates I learned a long
time ago and forgot most of.
The best I can say is that what ever it is in the Talmud that is
disturbing--it is usually the best thing to open up the Gemara itself and see
inside exactly what is being said in the context of the subject. In fact, when
I myself had questions of that sort with David Bronson, his usual reaction was
to suggest opening up that sugia [subject] and to learn it in depth to find out what is actually
being said.
Sometimes what is being said against the Talmud is simply based on misunderstanding. Sometimes there is a point.
To give one example: the value of "pi". This seemed to me to be a big question until David Bronson and I opened up the actual Gemara and saw that the Talmud states openly that they are just making an approximation.
Sometimes what is being said against the Talmud is simply based on misunderstanding. Sometimes there is a point.
To give one example: the value of "pi". This seemed to me to be a big question until David Bronson and I opened up the actual Gemara and saw that the Talmud states openly that they are just making an approximation.
For another example, I noticed that the time scale of the Torah in Genesis is kind of short. That is to say that you can trace from Adam until the destruction of the first Temple, and you only get a few thousand years. While we can see that the universe is expanding and starting from a point that stated around 13.5 billion years ago. But even before I saw that question I noticed that the Ari understands the Torah in a completely different way. It is not that he says he is explaining the secrets of Torah, rather he says he is giving the simple explanation while the secrets he himself hides in hints that need to be deciphered.
Sometimes norms of society to me do not seem so moral anyway. But other times they do.
One place on the internet I found helpful to answer lots of questions is the Kant Fries School of Kelley Ross. Other places are Michael Huemer's ideas about how reason perceives universals including moral values. And that does seem to be similar to the general approach of Ibn Pakuda and the Rambam. and in fact all the other rishonim that I can think of.