I thought it was Kant who thought that time only exists on the level of phenomenon, not dinge an sich? In any case, I recall vaguely that thefact that Nature violates Bell's inequality shows that either locality is not true, or that things have no classical values until they interact with other things or are measured. Since locality is true as shown by GPS satellites, therefore things have no absolute values in space or time until they interact. But they have probabilistic values. That is the way I tend to look at this. But then if this is true, then time exists. Locality implies causes must come before effects.
I think also Dr Kelley Ross has an essay on time in which he mentions McTaggart.
[This was my thought after I saw an essay by Edward Fesser]
[I ought to mention that not just observation but also simple interaction with other stuff can cause a collapse of the wave function.]
I think also Dr Kelley Ross has an essay on time in which he mentions McTaggart.
[This was my thought after I saw an essay by Edward Fesser]
[I ought to mention that not just observation but also simple interaction with other stuff can cause a collapse of the wave function.]
