29.4.16
race
race. I have thought for a long time that the way nature operates to take one species and make it into two or more is to start slowly with race. I based this idea on Darwin. The idea is that you take one species and separate it. You put one group on some island somewhere. Then you take another group and put it elsewhere. After a short amount of time that one species will be two species. That is what race is. Race is you take a group of humans they go down to Africa. Another group goes north. Eventually they become two species.
But added to this I need a little wisdom from the Talmud: that is is not a good idea to go against nature,- because nature will win.
But that still does not mean anything about how to treat other people. It has to do with groups but not individuals.
But added to this I need a little wisdom from the Talmud: that is is not a good idea to go against nature,- because nature will win.
But that still does not mean anything about how to treat other people. It has to do with groups but not individuals.
Second Amendment. Get groups together to get every possible Trump voter to the polls.
The religion of the left is power. I do not think they will give it up without a fight. Thus I think Americans ought to be armed in such a way to make a declaration of martial law and invalidation of the November election impossible.
One way you can defend the Second Amendment is by natural rights of self defense.
To help that things should not come to that Americans should be well armed and organized as groups. The best thing is to already get groups together to get every possible Trump voter to the polls.
One way you can defend the Second Amendment is by natural rights of self defense.
To help that things should not come to that Americans should be well armed and organized as groups. The best thing is to already get groups together to get every possible Trump voter to the polls.
There was a group of people in Rome that were religious followers of Plato. They followed Plato and learned him religiously just like we learn Gemara {Talmud.} They sat in the Beit Midrash all day and learned his writings. The Rosh Yeshiva gave a shiur klali [class for the whole yeshiva]every week and every day there were classes in Plato. One practice was someone would give a seminar. That is for young married men they would give something that would approach a regular class of a Rosh yeshiva but on a slightly lower level.
The unique thing about this place that I find fascinating is the efforts of the Rosh yeshiva to consider Aristotle as a commentary of Plato and not as an adversary.
There was no denying that Aristotle disagreed with Plato on important points but still they sought insights into Plato by means of Aristotle.
What became of this? It became the pillar of all Western Thought. The Neo Platonic school of thought became the basis of Saadia Gaon, the Rambam (Maimonides), Crescas, Hegel, the Ari (Arizal, Isaac Luria), Augustine, Ibn Gavirol.
The reason I bring this up is that I think people have made too much of a big deal out of the arguments between Kant and Hegel. Way too much. What I see is a kind of learning of Kant that would use insights of Hegel to understand Kant much like the Neo Platonic, Plotinus, used Aristotle as a commentary of Plato.
I mention this because I have been troubled for a long time about what you would call intellectual intuition. This I think is at least one major difference between Kant and Hegel. And On this issue I definitely go with Kant. But I can not see why that would cancel the insights of Hegel.
I admit i am nervous about saying this because of my lack of knowledge. Still I see this as a promising approach.
The unique thing about this place that I find fascinating is the efforts of the Rosh yeshiva to consider Aristotle as a commentary of Plato and not as an adversary.
There was no denying that Aristotle disagreed with Plato on important points but still they sought insights into Plato by means of Aristotle.
What became of this? It became the pillar of all Western Thought. The Neo Platonic school of thought became the basis of Saadia Gaon, the Rambam (Maimonides), Crescas, Hegel, the Ari (Arizal, Isaac Luria), Augustine, Ibn Gavirol.
The reason I bring this up is that I think people have made too much of a big deal out of the arguments between Kant and Hegel. Way too much. What I see is a kind of learning of Kant that would use insights of Hegel to understand Kant much like the Neo Platonic, Plotinus, used Aristotle as a commentary of Plato.
I mention this because I have been troubled for a long time about what you would call intellectual intuition. This I think is at least one major difference between Kant and Hegel. And On this issue I definitely go with Kant. But I can not see why that would cancel the insights of Hegel.
I admit i am nervous about saying this because of my lack of knowledge. Still I see this as a promising approach.
28.4.16
Meta-magical thinking and schizoid personality disorders.
Meta Magical thinking is something I have seen a lot of in the world of the cult that the Gra signed the excommunication on.
The leaders of the cult that the Gra signed the excommunication on almost certainly have schizo-typal personality disorders as do many of their followers. People have been able to discern the line between normal thinking, schizo-typal thinking and downright schizophrenia.
So the obvious question is what happens when there are real objective phenomena that seem to be above the natural order?
The awareness that there is spiritual thinking that is downright sick is a strong part of the Lithuanian yeshiva experience, and any slight suggestion of this kind of thinking is rigorously excluded.
They are very well aware that there are people that are very religious, but not from a healthy standpoint.
It would be helpful to have a useful measure of such things.
The problem is that this kind of thinking is sanctioned and when people are not outright schizophrenic and have some control they can direct their thinking in socially accepted direction and become the holy man of the community.
The problem that I see is that hanging out with sick people can make one sick --even if he starts out as perfectly normal and healthy. Furthermore following a sick person can make a whole community sick. These are the basic problems I see here.
I know this group likes to think of themselves as super Jews, beyond reproach. It is sad that the truth is just the opposite and the numbers of broken lives and broken homes they leave behind is horrific.
So I would say to be careful to adhere to what the Gra said in all subjects, and especially in this.
The leaders of the cult that the Gra signed the excommunication on almost certainly have schizo-typal personality disorders as do many of their followers. People have been able to discern the line between normal thinking, schizo-typal thinking and downright schizophrenia.
So the obvious question is what happens when there are real objective phenomena that seem to be above the natural order?
The awareness that there is spiritual thinking that is downright sick is a strong part of the Lithuanian yeshiva experience, and any slight suggestion of this kind of thinking is rigorously excluded.
They are very well aware that there are people that are very religious, but not from a healthy standpoint.
It would be helpful to have a useful measure of such things.
The problem is that this kind of thinking is sanctioned and when people are not outright schizophrenic and have some control they can direct their thinking in socially accepted direction and become the holy man of the community.
The problem that I see is that hanging out with sick people can make one sick --even if he starts out as perfectly normal and healthy. Furthermore following a sick person can make a whole community sick. These are the basic problems I see here.
I know this group likes to think of themselves as super Jews, beyond reproach. It is sad that the truth is just the opposite and the numbers of broken lives and broken homes they leave behind is horrific.
So I would say to be careful to adhere to what the Gra said in all subjects, and especially in this.
Meta-magical thinking and schizoid personality disorders.
Meta Magical thinking is something I have seen a lot of in the world of the cult that the Gra signed the excommunication on.
The leaders of the cult that the Gra signed the excommunication on almost certainly have schizo typal personality disorders as do many of their followers. People have been able to discern the line between normal thinking, schizo typal thinking and downright schizophrenia.
So the obvious question is what happens when there are real objective phenomena that seem to be above the natural order?
The awareness that there is spiritual thinking that is downright sick is a strong part of the Lithuanian yeshiva experience. and any slight suggestion of this kind of thinking is rigorously excluded.
They are very well aware that there are people that are very religious, but not from a healthy standpoint.
It would be helpful to have a useful measure of such things.
The problem is that this kind of thinking is sanctioned and when people are not outright schizophrenic and have some control they can direct their thinking in socially accepted direction and become the holy man of the community.
The problem that I see is that hanging out with sick people can make one sick --even if he starts out as perfectly normal and healthy. Furthermore following a sick person can make a whole community sick. These are the basic problems I see here.
The leaders of the cult that the Gra signed the excommunication on almost certainly have schizo typal personality disorders as do many of their followers. People have been able to discern the line between normal thinking, schizo typal thinking and downright schizophrenia.
So the obvious question is what happens when there are real objective phenomena that seem to be above the natural order?
The awareness that there is spiritual thinking that is downright sick is a strong part of the Lithuanian yeshiva experience. and any slight suggestion of this kind of thinking is rigorously excluded.
They are very well aware that there are people that are very religious, but not from a healthy standpoint.
It would be helpful to have a useful measure of such things.
The problem is that this kind of thinking is sanctioned and when people are not outright schizophrenic and have some control they can direct their thinking in socially accepted direction and become the holy man of the community.
The problem that I see is that hanging out with sick people can make one sick --even if he starts out as perfectly normal and healthy. Furthermore following a sick person can make a whole community sick. These are the basic problems I see here.
Hegel is like Aristotle
What Kelley Ross does is he has discrete steps in the a priori. That is not a continuum. That is one thing will be contingent to some higher a priori, but necessary for a lower level.
But within one area of value, he will have continuous values.
This again seem to me to go along with Hegel. Hegel does not want any universal to be contingent. But to him there is certainly a hierarchy of universals.
In other words though Hegel is like Aristotle in many ways, still in this one area he diverges. With Aristotle the universal is definitely dependent on the particular. Hegel does not want that. He wants the universal to contain the particular. Hegel calls the universal an independent immediacy. [Shorter Logic pg 159.]
But within one area of value, he will have continuous values.
This again seem to me to go along with Hegel. Hegel does not want any universal to be contingent. But to him there is certainly a hierarchy of universals.
In other words though Hegel is like Aristotle in many ways, still in this one area he diverges. With Aristotle the universal is definitely dependent on the particular. Hegel does not want that. He wants the universal to contain the particular. Hegel calls the universal an independent immediacy. [Shorter Logic pg 159.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)