The major problem in Philosophy today I think is really concentrated in deciding between three areas. One is Dr Kelley Ross (CA) of the Kant-Fries School. Another is Hegel and the third is the intuitionsts people like Dr Huemer in Colorado and Brian Caplan [which stems from Thomas Reid, and G.E Moore].
The rest of twentieth century so called philosophy [Linguistic and or so called analytic] is definitely defunct and as Dr John Searle {Berkley} puts it so eloquently: "It is obviously false."
The Medieval development of Plato and Aristotle as we see in the Rambam, Anselem, and Aquinas seems also important and highly relevant [as Dr Edward. Feser (CA) makes note of].
There is a lot I need to learn here. But just off hand it seems to me that Hegel, Dr Ross are not so far apart. But Hegel was in fact hijacked so some like Karl Popper blamed him for totalitarian systems that used his name.--Marx for example. But I think a close look at Hegel will show he was much closer to the American political system than is known.
Philosophy is relevant because of politics and economics and morals. Getting philosophy wrong means that one will get each of these other three things wrong. And if enough people get all those three things wrong things can get really off.
So getting it right is important even if one does not have a natural interest in it.
I have noticed that stable government does not come from people thinking about it through rational means. the balance between the people and the elite in Rome and England came through compromise, not planed through reason. Also, I have noticed a duality in powers. i always though of the U.S.S.R and the U.S.A as being the modern version of Sparta and Athens, and i have also noticed the two poles of power in the Middle Ages i.e. the church as opposed to the secular kings and princes.
