Religious extremism is not the problem. It is what kind of religious extremism .
In any case see this interesting Utube from Pragger University
It is not religious fanaticism that is the problem. Bach was a religious fanatic. Moses was a religious fanatic.
The Gra was a religious fanatic. Catholic nuns are religious fanatics. Mir Yeshiva students are religious fanatics. These people are not the problem. The problem is Islamic religion. Period.
I could go further. The problem is זה לעומת זה. For every true tzadik there is an equal and opposite anti Tzadik.
That is for every area of value there is an opposing area of value. And usually each area has one person that represented that area to the fullest human capacity. [Thus it is necessary to identify the people that were connected to the realm of goodness and holiness and to identify the opposite. This is because people need some guide in each realm. ]
This diagram from Dr. Kelley Ross's site might help to show what I mean
In any case see this interesting Utube from Pragger University
It is not religious fanaticism that is the problem. Bach was a religious fanatic. Moses was a religious fanatic.
The Gra was a religious fanatic. Catholic nuns are religious fanatics. Mir Yeshiva students are religious fanatics. These people are not the problem. The problem is Islamic religion. Period.
I could go further. The problem is זה לעומת זה. For every true tzadik there is an equal and opposite anti Tzadik.
That is for every area of value there is an opposing area of value. And usually each area has one person that represented that area to the fullest human capacity. [Thus it is necessary to identify the people that were connected to the realm of goodness and holiness and to identify the opposite. This is because people need some guide in each realm. ]
This diagram from Dr. Kelley Ross's site might help to show what I mean
