Children and teenagers in the USA are given radical left wing socialist induction lessons from
kindergarten until the end of high school.
This is the basic approach
of all public schools in the USA. Yet at home children are given a set of
Judeo-
Christian values. But these
Judeo-Christian values are not compatible with the wave
of indoctrination they get in public school. And even if children would like to
defend the values they get at home the fact is that Judeo- Christian values are hard
to defend. Even Aquinas left a basic question he was unable to resolve and other questions that he could not resolve very well.
The difficulty this
presents is that after 12 years of indoctrination you can’t expect people to vote
in any way other than the way that reflects their basic socialist values. What
is the surprise? No wonder Republicans have trouble.
I could suggest that
everyone should start to learn Gemara, Rashi, and Tosphot [Talmud]--but to do so
I would have to explain in what way this can provide a solution for the
American dilemma and set of problems.
This might need a little
more time than I have right now.
But I think I can give a
basic introduction into the idea. I might not be able to finish but let me
begin.
Human history is divided
into three parts. Period one has in it three part Pre Socratics, Plato, and neo
Plato, This period deals with how is change possible.
Period two is the Middle
Ages. This deals more religious issues but issues which also relate to
philosophy. The two issues are free will and divine simplicity. Here also there
was leading up period and then the peak in Moshe Ben Maimon [or Aquinas
depending on who you ask].
The modern period dealt
with two issues also the mind body problem, and the debate between the
rationalists and the empiricists.--How is knowledge possible? This went up
until Kant. Then we had the post Kant period. Here also were three parts pre
Kant, Kant and post Kant. [Also politics became an issue in this period.]
Now a new period is starting.
I can't predicate the question that is going to seize the interest of mankind
for the next thousand years. But I can say that people are going to need and
anchor of rationality and moral value--the very thing you get when you learn
the Torah together with the Gemara, Rashi, and Tosphot.
I can imagine that one major question will deal with the interface between Divine law in the Torah and how it relates to the natural law and natural rights. This is a continuation of Medieval thought but with the modern advent of the USA the fact of natural rights will become important as it relates to divine law.
[note 1]
Another important aspect of the Talmud which I did not mention but which is relevant is because of the problem with the theory political authority. I did mention in the essay that one question that will arise in the future is the interface between political authority and Divine authority abut what needs to be pointed out here is the fact that John Locke's ideas of natural rights really have no empirical basis. It is not just that Habermas and others have noted the problems with the theoretical basis of the Constitution of the USA and the more obvious problems with the total lack of intellectual justification for Marxist doctrine. It is that a new theory of political justification is necessary. Habermas blew John Rawls theory out of the water but that still leaves us with need to defend or modify the system of John Locke. In short: Divine Law is back. You just can't get around it.