Even though the Musar movement was based on the idea of learning the four basic Musar books חובות לבבות, אורחות צדיקים, שערי תשובה, מסילת ישרים ,  I found the Light Of Israel and other books by the disiples of Rav Israel Salanter to be of the most help to me. Musar also helps to understand what Torah is all about. It is all too easy to go off on confused  directions because of lack of understanding the hierarchy of principle in Torah.  

[Though I do find the books of Rav Nahman very helpful even though they are  not a part of the regular Musar books still I should add that I think Rav Nahman is mostly good if people already have a good background in Gemara, the Ari, and Musar. --But I do not deny that he can be helpful for everyone also. Still without the prerequisites, there is a tendency to go off in odd directions.

[Musar is based on the idea of learning these books of morals from the Middle Ages, Obligations of the Hearts, Gates of Repentance, Ways of the Righteous and also the book of Rav Moshe Haim Lutzato The Ways of the Just.

 There is a connection between Devekut [attachment with God] and learning Torah even though this is often denied. In fact I think that the sort of learning in depth at Shar Yashuv and the Mir were for me a sort of bridge towards a deep attachment --devekut [attachment with God]. But talking with people you always hear how learning Torah is dry intellectualism as opposed to real attachment with God. I think this dichotomy is false. In fact I believe the only real path towards authentic attachment with God is by learning Torah.

And the enemies of the Gra and the straight Litvak path  I think are in deep self delusion that their idiocies somehow amount to attachment with God. In fact, you can see the exact opposite of their claims. Good character is connected with true attachment with God. Since good honest character is found in the Litvak world therefore by definition that is where you will find true attachment with God. [I am not saying good character is universal in the Litvak world but rather that it characterizes that world. Exceptions do not discount the rule.] [I admit the Dark Side has enter into the Litvak world. however there still is a trace of authentic Torah.]

 The actual source from where Rav Nahman [Breslov] (LeM vol I ch 12 annd 28 ) brings the idea of Torah scholars that are demons does not say that exact idea. The actual Zohar [Parshat Pinchas] does say there are demons that are expert in Torah. But then Rav Nahman deduces that since there are Jewish demons and Gentile demons thus it seems that these demons can enter into people and take over their minds and souls. Actually there are plenty of examples as we know about some murderers that actually feel that their minds were taken over. 

The problem with demonic Torah scholars I think is that they ruin the reputation of Torah when it becomes clear to people what they actually are under the fancy clothing and pretense. [This is think is the reason you see this subject raised in the LeM  so many times.--Not however always in the same way. Sometimes he talks about מפרסמים של שקר famous religious leaders that are deceivers. Sometimes he talks about not giving authority to those who are not fit. 

My impression is that if people would simply pay attention to the signature of the Gra on the famous letter of excommunication and to Rav Shach, they they would be better off. After all the general Litvak yeshiva world is about straight Torah with no pretenses or claims. What you see is what you get.

[There is no question that Rav Nachman undderstands that there are demonic forces in the world a a large portion of them occupy the souls of people that look and act like Torah scholars. Thee is however a way to be saved from them and that is by  faith in the wise. That is to believe that the Gra must have had some reason for putting his signature on the letter of excommunication even if we may not understand the reason right now. --However I think I can see the reason. The Gra saw through the façade of deception.

 It is an odd sort of fact that western sort of approaches have the parents being not very worthy of respect.--starting with the faith of the Greeks where the child of Chaos kills him and takes over the throne. Then his child kills him... etc. A whole series of children killing their father until you get to Zeus.

 This is so much different than Confucius where you find the root of all virtue is piety towards ones parents--emulating their ways and actually serving them in gratitude for all they did for him or her even much more before they can remember.

[One thing you see in Confucius is an important point-is that  baalei teshuva [people that have left the way of their parents in order to join the religious] are by definition wicked. And you can see this. This is the reason why the great yeshivas like Brisk do not accept baali teshuva-- after all, if they can abandon the path of their parents, they can not be stable decent human beings. [No matter how religious they imagine themselves.]

 I was reading a bit more about the wife of Rav Kinyevsky [she passed away 17 Tishrei] and noted an interesting fact. That he would make a sium [a small party in honor of finishing a tractate] every year on the whole Shas, that is the regular Gemara [Babylonian ] and also the Yerushalmi [Written in Tiberias] with the rishonim [medieval authorities] and some achronim [authorities after the Middle Ages]. That would be on the day before Passover. And the wine from that party would be called the sium wine and people would save it and later apply it as a remedy for different kinds of maladies.

It puts a sort of nostalgia in me for the golden years that I was in two great yeshivas where Torah was learned for its own sake.  [Both in NY , Shar Yashuv and Mirrer.]

[This however was not exactly like the path of my parents who had great respect for Torah, but their path was more along the line of emphasizing other aspects of Torah like "to be  a mensch"[decent human being], to be self reliant--never to ask or accept charity. My dad had gone to Cal Tech, and I certainly showed a lot of interest in following him in that path when I was young. 

So nowadays I try to walk in this sort of middle path of trying to learn Torah along with Math and Physics as I think my parents would have approved of.

Rav Kinyevsky  is the son of the Steipler who wrote some great books on Shas and who was one of the great sages of the Litvak world which walk more or less in the path of the Gra. (Not enough so , since they ignore the signature of the Gra on the letter of excommunication. I never got into the books of the Steipler since they were around in yeshivot when I was just trying to manage with Gemara Rashi and the Maharsha. Much less get into achronim. Only much later when I was learning with David Bronson did I learn --or relearn- the path of study in depth .

I should mention that learning Torah seems to require a wife that appreciates that approach. While the way of learning Torah for its own sake --and not receive money for doing so-still there a need for wife that appreciates this service of learning Torah. 

 A Zava (a woman who has seen blood more than seven days) needs living waters [-a sea or spring,-- not a regular mikve ( a place where rain waters have collected). So if we are worried about Ziva [seeing blood for longer than seven days]--which apparently we are since we require seven clean days, then why not also require a spring or sea? 

The wife of Rav Kinyevsky

I noticed in the book about the wife of Rav Kinyevsky a point about "bitul Torah". [Bitul Torah means not learning Torah when one can.] What I could gather from the book is that she held strongly to the idea that you see in the Gemara that a good wife is one who helps her husband to learn Torah. I forget the exact Gemara but from what I can recall it goes something like this: טל אורות טלייך ["The dew of lights is your dew."] Who will rise in the time of the revival of the dead? One who has the dew of Torah.  If so, then how can women merit to the revival of the dead? By enabling their husbands to learn Torah and by bringing up their children to learn Torah. 

So this is apparently what she did. There is brought lots of stories in that book showing this. She would heat and reheat the meals of her husband so that when he would get home it would be already warm so he could have his meal immediately and then get back to learning.  When there was almost nothing to eat, she would make a full meal for her husband and for herself have just bread and margarine. One time someone wanted to talk with her husband when he was learning and she said, "He is learning now." They countered this with, "What would be the big deal to spend a few minutes away from learning?" She answered "Do you want my husband to be an am haaretz (ignoramus)?"  

{I recall this sort of atmosphere at the Mir and in Shar Yashuv. However over the years I have taken a slightly different approach. That is what you see in some rishonim that Physics and Metaphysics and a part of the commandment of learning Torah.] [Even  the Gra held that ignorance of any fact in the seven wisdoms causes ignorance in Torah a hundred fold.]