I noticed that someone is saying that the whole Covid thing is in order to get people to agree to accept the vaccine which will have a gene sequence that will affect and sabotage one's own DNA..
My feeling is this is probable. Covid is a hoax
10.6.20
How nice it would be to have a wormhole which does not drag you into the center and connects to a different universe and does not even pull you towards the sides but gives you a nice easy trip to another universe or galaxy. Would that not be really convenient?
I just saw yesterday an interesting article. https://inspirehep.net/conferences/968592
Or the PDF is here: https://s3.cern.ch/inspire-prod-files-e/ef8e5a89fc3d6bda1793928980f70abd
It is authored by someone in Russia and part of a conference on the name of Alexander Friedman about Gravity.
A non flat metric leads to a different kind of wormhole. Could this be a hint for the far distant future about how to transverse a wormhole?
This is his conclusion: "Now, we can see that our solution contains a traversible wormhole [5] at r = -r0 connecting two infinite space - times r > -r0 and r < -r0 • It consist of two asymptotically Lobachevskyan spaces. The scalar curvature takes different asymptotical values on these sheets. Moreover, while on the sheet with the biggest curvature we have attraction by the central source, but on the sheet with the lower curvature we have repulsion! Concluding, this solution seems to be interesting since it is spherically symmetric and free from singularity."
How nice it would be to have a wormhole which does not drag you into the center and connects to a different universe and does not even pull you towards the sides but gives you a nice easy trip to another universe or galaxy. Would that not be really convenient?
[Or see the other papers from that conference
This is his conclusion: "Now, we can see that our solution contains a traversible wormhole [5] at r = -r0 connecting two infinite space - times r > -r0 and r < -r0 • It consist of two asymptotically Lobachevskyan spaces. The scalar curvature takes different asymptotical values on these sheets. Moreover, while on the sheet with the biggest curvature we have attraction by the central source, but on the sheet with the lower curvature we have repulsion! Concluding, this solution seems to be interesting since it is spherically symmetric and free from singularity."
How nice it would be to have a wormhole which does not drag you into the center and connects to a different universe and does not even pull you towards the sides but gives you a nice easy trip to another universe or galaxy. Would that not be really convenient?
[Or see the other papers from that conference
9.6.20
The Gra predicted the Holocaust. He said the book of Deuteronomy is divided into ten sections. Each section correspond to 100 years of the the 6th thousand year period. That starts at 1240. So 1939 is the very end of the section called "Ki Tavo" כי תבוא". The end of the section are the curses.
When he was explaining this to his disciple Rav Haim of Voloshin Rav Haim asked him where is the Gra himself hinted at in the Torah. He said אבן שלמה יהיה לך a perfect stone will be to you. [That is a stone use as a weight for measuring. "A perfect stone" is the letters Eliyahu ben Shelomo. Taking this a bit further one can see that it is a command of the Torah to walk in the path of the Gra since it says " a perfect Stone (the Gra) will be to you."
[This ends at 2240 AD. Then a new cycle will begin, I assume on Mars. But it could be that will be to the stars.]
When he was explaining this to his disciple Rav Haim of Voloshin Rav Haim asked him where is the Gra himself hinted at in the Torah. He said אבן שלמה יהיה לך a perfect stone will be to you. [That is a stone use as a weight for measuring. "A perfect stone" is the letters Eliyahu ben Shelomo. Taking this a bit further one can see that it is a command of the Torah to walk in the path of the Gra since it says " a perfect Stone (the Gra) will be to you."
[This ends at 2240 AD. Then a new cycle will begin, I assume on Mars. But it could be that will be to the stars.]
8.6.20
mankind to the stars
SLS and Starship are two kinds of starships that are now being used to bring men to the moon and Mars. But I have to say that I can see the importance of settling on Mars, but I would rather if mankind could go to the stars. In any way is that possible? Well, there is no way of knowing until the Physics is clear. Faster than light is out. So what is left is a Einstein-Rosen bridge [Worm Hole].
How could you get this? The only way is through string theory--branes. String theory needs to be clearer in order to see if branes can do something like that. Branes are funny kinds of things because they are in fact like strings, but in other ways not like strings. That is they are not under space time. They are in space time just like strings. But things in space time can effect space time. For example Gravity. Another example is the Aahronov Bohm effect that effects easily the nature of empty space easily and simply. [Just put a solenoid near the path of a charged particle. It effects the very nature of empty space.]
See this paper by Tentyukov printed in Russia which discusses a worm hole that is possible to transverse. That is when the metric is not flat.
How could you get this? The only way is through string theory--branes. String theory needs to be clearer in order to see if branes can do something like that. Branes are funny kinds of things because they are in fact like strings, but in other ways not like strings. That is they are not under space time. They are in space time just like strings. But things in space time can effect space time. For example Gravity. Another example is the Aahronov Bohm effect that effects easily the nature of empty space easily and simply. [Just put a solenoid near the path of a charged particle. It effects the very nature of empty space.]
See this paper by Tentyukov printed in Russia which discusses a worm hole that is possible to transverse. That is when the metric is not flat.
The debate between Kant and Hegel seems to have come down to a debate between McTaggart and Leonard Nelson with Dr Kelley Ross.
Most of philosophy of the 20th was trash as Robert Hana shows in excruciating painstaking rigorous detail. In his book THE FATE OF ANALYSIS: Analytic Philosophy From Frege To The Ash-Heap of History,
So what is left after all others are gone? Hegel and and Nelson.
There are plenty of problems however with both. I can see why people like Ed Feser simply want to get back to philosophy of the Middle Ages--Aquinas's approach to Aristotle in particular.
But that does not seem like the best idea. See Thomas Reid's discussion of Berkeley. Though he disagrees it also seems clear he would not get back to Aristotle.
Most of philosophy of the 20th was trash as Robert Hana shows in excruciating painstaking rigorous detail. In his book THE FATE OF ANALYSIS: Analytic Philosophy From Frege To The Ash-Heap of History,
So what is left after all others are gone? Hegel and and Nelson.
There are plenty of problems however with both. I can see why people like Ed Feser simply want to get back to philosophy of the Middle Ages--Aquinas's approach to Aristotle in particular.
But that does not seem like the best idea. See Thomas Reid's discussion of Berkeley. Though he disagrees it also seems clear he would not get back to Aristotle.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)