Belief in God is rational. Everything has a cause. So unless there is a first cause, then you would have an infinite regress. And then nothing could exist. Therefore there must be a first cause. Therefore God, the first cause, exists. QED.
28.6.15
The Sages of the Talmud said that every group of people has a very specific evil inclination that applies to that group much more than other groups. When you are part of some particular group it is hard to see this in your own group, but it is easy to see in other groups.
These are not stereotypes, but actual patterns of behaviors that are easily predicative. (See the hidden diaries of Karl Jung about the shadow side of women, and you will understand why a woman will chase after you one day, and then when you are down and out, she will dump you like yesterday’s trash.) A certain group I know has theft embedded deep into its DNA. It is not that they don't see anything wrong with theft. It is that they cant have a good day without it. Another group I know of are bullies. They can't think in any other way but that they ought to control everyone else. Another group I am all too familiar with are insane. Everyone has a different kind of insanity but you can't be part of that group unless you have some kind of mental problem. I could go on and on.
The truth is we are all social creatures and need to be part of some group, and then when we join some group the evil inclination of that group invariably affects us.
See review of lucifer principle by bloom
See also Lucifer Principle
I have trouble reading things on line. If you can buy Howard Blooms Lucifer Principle and Allen Bloom's Closing of the American Mind and that is the best option. Both these books are worth their weight in gold.
the-closing-of-the-american-mind
What I am saying here is built upon the idea of Howard Bloom's super organism. I am saying not just that the super-organism is built upon units of social information [memes] as he says but that in each group there is a hidden יצר הרע evil inclination.
And I agree with him that not all groups are equal in value. some groups have more than a hidden evil inclination. Their basic social meme is founded on some evil principle.
To make this more concrete:
There are yeshivas where people learn Musar [Classical Jewish Ethics]. That is a good social meme. But there is still a hidden evil inclination as I mentioned in other essays. But in itself learning Musar is a great idea. [These yeshivas go by a nickname of "Litvak Yeshivas" or more properly Lithuania Yeshivas.] They are in general good groups and in fact it is almost impossible to get an idea of what Torah is about without going to one for at least some period.]
On teh other hand there are social groups that are founded on social meme of murder. That is their core thesis is that it is good to murder infidels. This group might also have hidden evil inclination but it is more likely that the evil is apparent and the good is hidden.
These are not stereotypes, but actual patterns of behaviors that are easily predicative. (See the hidden diaries of Karl Jung about the shadow side of women, and you will understand why a woman will chase after you one day, and then when you are down and out, she will dump you like yesterday’s trash.) A certain group I know has theft embedded deep into its DNA. It is not that they don't see anything wrong with theft. It is that they cant have a good day without it. Another group I know of are bullies. They can't think in any other way but that they ought to control everyone else. Another group I am all too familiar with are insane. Everyone has a different kind of insanity but you can't be part of that group unless you have some kind of mental problem. I could go on and on.
The truth is we are all social creatures and need to be part of some group, and then when we join some group the evil inclination of that group invariably affects us.
See review of lucifer principle by bloom
See also Lucifer Principle
I have trouble reading things on line. If you can buy Howard Blooms Lucifer Principle and Allen Bloom's Closing of the American Mind and that is the best option. Both these books are worth their weight in gold.
the-closing-of-the-american-mind
What I am saying here is built upon the idea of Howard Bloom's super organism. I am saying not just that the super-organism is built upon units of social information [memes] as he says but that in each group there is a hidden יצר הרע evil inclination.
And I agree with him that not all groups are equal in value. some groups have more than a hidden evil inclination. Their basic social meme is founded on some evil principle.
To make this more concrete:
There are yeshivas where people learn Musar [Classical Jewish Ethics]. That is a good social meme. But there is still a hidden evil inclination as I mentioned in other essays. But in itself learning Musar is a great idea. [These yeshivas go by a nickname of "Litvak Yeshivas" or more properly Lithuania Yeshivas.] They are in general good groups and in fact it is almost impossible to get an idea of what Torah is about without going to one for at least some period.]
On teh other hand there are social groups that are founded on social meme of murder. That is their core thesis is that it is good to murder infidels. This group might also have hidden evil inclination but it is more likely that the evil is apparent and the good is hidden.
27.6.15
Sin is a great subject
Sin is a great subject. But a confusing one also.
When people are careful in minor rituals, it is usually at the expense major law principles.
So even though terms like "sin" are thrown around, it usually has little to do with what the Torah actually consider to be sin.
The insane religious world are the worst offenders in this regard, but not the only ones. The trouble is they confuse the whole concept of what it means to keep Torah. Because they erase the Ten Commandments, people get the idea that the Ten Commandments are not a part of keeping Torah.
Is there any concept of honor of your parents in the insane religious world? ? Not at all. All the honor goes solely to religious leaders. Stealing? They might not kidnap your wife and children, but they will try to convince your wife to leave you. [But they do kidnap your children.] In short, there is nothing in the Ten Commandments they consider binding.
When people are careful in minor rituals, it is usually at the expense major law principles.
So even though terms like "sin" are thrown around, it usually has little to do with what the Torah actually consider to be sin.
The insane religious world are the worst offenders in this regard, but not the only ones. The trouble is they confuse the whole concept of what it means to keep Torah. Because they erase the Ten Commandments, people get the idea that the Ten Commandments are not a part of keeping Torah.
Is there any concept of honor of your parents in the insane religious world? ? Not at all. All the honor goes solely to religious leaders. Stealing? They might not kidnap your wife and children, but they will try to convince your wife to leave you. [But they do kidnap your children.] In short, there is nothing in the Ten Commandments they consider binding.
Worshipers of Corpses
The major obstacles to keeping Torah are the the insane religious world , those that make a display of keeping Torah..
What the the insane religious world call repentance is horizontal repentance. It is moving over from one group to join their group. It has nothing to do with repentance of the Torah which is vertical repentance.
I will not hide the fact that I consider the the insane religious world to be mainly idolaters because of their worship of corpses.
What the the insane religious world call repentance is horizontal repentance. It is moving over from one group to join their group. It has nothing to do with repentance of the Torah which is vertical repentance.
So to keep Torah I think you can either go to Reform temple or Conservative one--though that is really not the best option. [Reform and conservative have been hijacked by principles not like the Torah.] The better option I think is Mizrachi or what is called religious Zionist. There is a complaint about the Mizrachi that they got too much into nationalism and have become a part of the establishment, still their basic approach is about as close to Torah as I think is feasible.
Or you could join a Lithuanian yeshiva which is perhaps even better than Mizrachi [religious Zionist] because of the level of Torah study. Mizrachi tends to be a little weaker in that area. Though I have met people that are associated with religious Zionism who do learn Torah on a high level but the Mizrachi just don't have people of the stature of Rav Elazar Menachem Shach or other Litvak Gedolim.
Though I was at two Lithuanian yeshivas both of which were great places, I think the anti Zionist stance is a poison which is like slowly acting acid which decays the foundations. Today there are no Litvak gedolim. Why not? I say it is the antisemitism embedded in their anti Israel stance.
Or you could join a Lithuanian yeshiva which is perhaps even better than Mizrachi [religious Zionist] because of the level of Torah study. Mizrachi tends to be a little weaker in that area. Though I have met people that are associated with religious Zionism who do learn Torah on a high level but the Mizrachi just don't have people of the stature of Rav Elazar Menachem Shach or other Litvak Gedolim.
Though I was at two Lithuanian yeshivas both of which were great places, I think the anti Zionist stance is a poison which is like slowly acting acid which decays the foundations. Today there are no Litvak gedolim. Why not? I say it is the antisemitism embedded in their anti Israel stance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)