שכל הנקנה Acquired Intellect

 In one of the beginning chapters of the Le.M of Rav Nahman of Uman [I forget the number. I think it was around 14] is brought that what is left of a person in the next world is שכל הקנה Acquired Intellect. This concept he brings from The Guide for the Perplexed. What seems significant here is that not every subject that one studies contributes to his everlasting life. For example, how to become an expert at chess would not have anything to contribute to one's life in the World to Come. So just by simple reasoning we can see there is a difference between subjects. So study of how to become a decent person (Musar), we can understand contributes to  one's everlasting salvation, since good character traits are not automatically acquired. One needs to pick up good character traits from parents or friends etc. There is no one that makes up their own value system out of thin air. They get it from TV, movies , Internet etc.

Another point is we can see learning the objective knowledge, knowledge that can be easily seen to be of the way God created the world, this knowledge can  called the works of God. This object knowledge can be Physics or Mathematics or other aspects of Creation that are not man made knowledge, even though they needed to be discovered by Man. 

Defense of faith in the Torah. To have faith in the way of my parents--to have faith but not to be making money out of it like the religious do.

 What can be a defense of faith in the Torah after that many questions are clear. Dr Michael Huemer brings this up and I have thought how to answer this. I have thought if there is some way to express my approach this.  I mentioned there in a comment, the idea of the Kant-Fries school of thought. That means a commitment to non intuitive immediate knowledge,(which is similar to faith in that it holds of the categories by knowledge that is known but not known by reason nor experience) plus with the idea of Dr. Kelley Ross this means that the closer one gets to areas of value that are not within the area of conditions of possible experience [with space and time and causality], one gets to contradictions that can not be resolved except by faith.   [However, I can not agree that this discounts Hegel. For I see Hegel as being correct that in essence even knowledge of God is possible and necessary as King David said to Solomon, "Know the God of your father, and serve Him."

Plus I ought to mention that I have great faith in God. It seems clear to me that this is a sort of knowledge that is not through the senses nor through reason.

But I do not try to overly strenuously defend faith for I realize lot and most of those with faith have a sort of different kind of problem.- i.e. they think they know that which they do not know. I.e. the religious tend to think they are better and smarter than everyone else, while the opposite is 99% of the time to be the case. [You can see this in the Torah itself. Who were the people that were against Moses? See the Rashi on the very first verse of Parshat Korah. They  were the religious leaders- the very heads of the Sanhedrin and smaller sanhedrins. The religious leaders are the enemies of Torah. They have found away to gain power and money by seeming to be smart in Torah.]

It is better to have faith in the way of my parents--to have faith, but not to be making money out of it like the religious do.

God created the world from nothing, not from Himself.

 Even though the Nefesh Hachaim [by Rav Chaim of Voloshin] is a great and important book, still I have to disagree with one aspect. He says that from the aspect, or point of view of God, there is nothing besides Him. But from our point of view, things are not Godliness.

The problem with this is it does not explain anything. Things are all God, or they are not.

The other problem is that the point of view of the Rishonim was that God created the world from nothing, not from Himself. [Not like a spider that makes its web from itself. God is not a spider. He made the world from nothing., not from himself.]  Even the Ari brings this very idea that Creation was from nothing in the very beginning of the Eitz Chaim. The world is definitely not Godliness  in the very beginning of the Eitz Chaim.  [The reason all this is not clear nowadays is he religious leaders are stupid and do not understand what they are reading.]

Ex Nihilo is the view of Torah.

Slav is not interchangeable with WASP.

 In the West the fall of the USSR was thought to be a liberating moment. And for many perhaps it was. But when I talked to people on the street the attitude was the opposite. They always said things were better during the time of the USSR. (But they  could not say this aloud to others because of fear of being informed on, and often violently attacked. Only to me, a stranger, did they feel safe to express their real feelings.) )And my experience shows this to a large degree. 

There was something that was hard to understand that was going on there. All I can say is: "People" is not a term that is interchangeable between one group and the other. Our DNA says a lot about how we act. Just like the chemical composition of water H2O says a lot about how it react to cold--as opposed to H2O2 boiling point.

Slav is not interchangeable with WASP. [What works in the USA or England in not the same thing that can work--over there.] WASP is not interchangeable with black. 

[So my impression is not to interfere because in a city like the ones I was in, most people are not at all interested in fighting.] See the verse in Proverbs: כאוחז באזני כלב כן מתערב בריב לא לו  "One who gets involved in a fight that is not his is like one who grabs the ears of a dog" 

  

 The simple explanation of Torah in the stories is mystic and in the laws-literal. That is the way I understood things. When reading the Ari Isaac Luria, I saw that he was understanding the the simple explanation of the seven days of Creation was that it was referring to the higher sepherot. The point of Torah is the commandments. Those are meant literally, But even the commandments are meant to bring to natural law as we see in the argument between R Simon ben Yochai and the sages about if we go by the reason for the commandments or the letter of the law. But to both the reason is known. So R Shimon says one can take the garment of a rich widow.  

 Not all secular learning is secular. Even though Rav Nahman and many others  say to stay away from secular studies, still not all that is listed as secular is in fact so. On one hand, some are clearly man-made and not a part of Torah, however there are wisdoms that include the wisdom of God. So you find Rishonim (mediaeval authorities) that include Physics in the category of the things one is supposed to learn every day. And among those Rishonim are Ibn Pakuda. the author of the Duties of the Hearts.-

So while in the Mir in NY, one was not allowed to attend Brooklyn Collage  while at the Mir, still when I asked the rosh yeshiva [Rav Shmuel Berenbaum] about this policy, he said one can learn Physics for the sake of making a living. But as deep a thinker he was, I think that this distinction  he did not make.

The wonders of God hidden in the work of Creation

 

אזכור מעללי יה כי אזכרה ממקדם פלאיך "I will mention the wonders of God, for from ancient times I will mention your wonders. The wonders of God hidden in the work of Creation are no less wonderful  that if they had been written in the Gemara/Oral Law

I should mention some of the many places in the LeM of Rav Nahman of Uman where learning Physics is thought to be learning the wisdom of God.  And that is wisdom that does not depend on the opinion of any person to check and see if it is correct, but rather Nature. One place that comes to mind is טבעו בארץ שעריה  "Her gates are buried in the ground." Her gates refers to the depth of understanding of the Torah. They are buried in the ground. This is in Lamentations. That means the depths of knowledge of Torah after the Destruction of the First Temple are buried in the dirt. That is in the very substance of physical matter- that is where to find the wisdom of Torah.

Another place in the LeM is that the hidden Torah in  the work of Creation which is the highest Torah.

Another place is that to reveal open Torah to a wicked person would make him worse. So Torah must be revealed to him through secular things.-things that do not seem holy.  

The point is there s hidden Torah in mundane things and that one can reveal the hidden Torah inside of secular things. It is possible to serve God through what seem to be secular but in fact in hidden holiness. 

_______________________________________________________________________

 ויתר מהמה בני הזהר עשות ספרים הרבה אין קץ ולהג הרבה יגיעת בשר  קהלת י''ב פסוק י''ב This is verse in the Book of Ecclesiastes, "And more so my son be careful. To making many books there is no end and they are a joke and tiring out of flesh." 

As my learning partner once told me, "There are too many books." The point is brought out by Rav Shach. He explains books that go into the details of the Gemara -this is a great and important thing. But books that  supposedly are about the foundations of faith are a waste of time.

The Midrash Kohelet on this verse  says the word "מהמה" is an unusual construction. (It could have said, "מהם.")The reason is to hint to the idea that it refers to מהומה (confusion).  Making many books that you see in the religious world just brings more confusion, not clarity.

This is especially so in light of the Rif and Rosh on the Mishna in Sanhedrin (perek Chelek) that explain "outside books" means books that explain the Torah but not based on midrashei Chazal==the explanations of the sages of the Mishna and Gemara. 

So outside books does not refer to books on natural science but rather to the vast majority of the stuff the religious are always putting out which all explain the Torah, but never according to any midrash of the sages. 

I admit I got tired of the mind tricks the religious are always playing, and decided instead to learn straight Gemara, with the natural sciences, especially  Physics and Mathematics. Better to find out what the Torah really says instead of depending on the insane religious world.

The reason to learn Physics is that it does not depend on people's opinions. Thus it connects you what is real. To what is really real, not to people's opinions about what is real. [Besides that there is the point of the Gra that any lack of knowledge in the seven wisdoms results in a hundred times fold lack of knowledge of Torah.]

That is to say, it can be tested. Reality can prove or disprove a theory. 

Thus it is objective knowledge not knowledge about what other people think--which is not knowledge at all.

And I should add that I have started with doing the ten times of review  of every paragraph. I keep fast learning in reserve, but for now I feel I need to get the idea before going on.]